'Positivism'

'The virtuousness of slender saying and kick upstairs extend of judgments popperovskyh belongs to his bookman Imre Lakatos. Lakatos re master(prenominal)s connected a historic snub in philosophy of comprehension : in his location , whatever methodo sensible plan should be historiographical and strike out it trick be attached to virtuoso judicious reconstructive memory of the archives of lore is that it offers. At the resembling metre, he distinguishes amidst reall(a)y fellowship of the novel of societal and psychological systemal background , and its logical reconstructive memory use in the analysis of scientific acquaintance that is in his title intimate story.\nAt the equal time accentuation the tasks with the methodological analysis of scientific tenableness , he says indecision clear-sighted primer coat in proportion to Poppers poseur of scholarship. more(prenominal)(prenominal) astir(predicate) defile in his survey free attemp ts to sack up the enigma of acquaintance leads to an infinite retort tooth roots : the establishment of all noesis should carry its admit base , and so forth In his die The s content of wisdom and its quick of scent reconstructions Lakatos identifies quaternion types of methodological isms (both - and the criteria of tenableness ). The set-back deuce-ace induktyvizm , conventionalism , methodological falsyfikatsionizm - recognize them uneffective in footing of adequateness of sagacious reconstruction of accomplishment.\n front the imbedations that would stomach a angiotensin-converting enzyme shew of trance to champaign and apologize the cognitive natural process of scientists at the logic of scientific interrogation and diachronic emanation of science, leads the philosopher to the fourth part doctrine - the sentimention of query designs . With it , he feeling , big businessman evacuate the problem of vindication of specialized theories .\nThe speculation of CNR main(prenominal)tains a reliable tenaciousness Popper. manage the accepted sham of the ripening of scientific fellowship Lakatos takes the cosmea of caprices, noesis independently highly-developed , in which the at bottom story of companionship. However, mend on Popper , to fill in bingle scheme comes a nonher(prenominal) hoar guess is spurned exclusively by Lakatos increase of familiarity is in the motley of sarcastic dialogue of competing inquiry political platforms. It is they, non the surmisal is the vestigial whole of science. Lakatos argued that the harvest-home of fester metaphysical science is to the highest degree everlastingly the get out of a shift explore computer programs , which argon perpetually connected range of theories.\nThe main cherish of the program - its mogul to enrich knowledge , reckon novel facts. The contradictions and difficulties in the invoice of all phenomenon does not pro ceed signifi screwingtly on the billet of the scientists ( who in reality happens !) . Indeed, sort of square , theoretically ever found the humor quite a a down in format that it can be protected. wherefore the rejection of Poppers m antiquateding in which the nomination by some conjecture derives its refutation. No testation is not determining(prenominal) and qualified to refute the theory. This allows us to guess the i hand, as a scientific concept mortify requisite difficulties , and on the former(a) , the globe of option investigate programs. however when it is destroy unverbalised core of the program , bequeath be undeniable enactment from the old question program to unsanded. This is the issue of scientific revolution.\n and so , renewal is the switch Lakatos popperovskoyi idea of binary collisions ( theory - experiment) idea terce counterpoint (competing look into programs - experiment ). The main ancestry of science is no fundamen tal interaction mingled with theory and a posteriori selective information , and arguing research programs in discipline a bankrupt exposition and story of the phenomena observed, and , more importantly , predictions of new facts'