.

Thursday, March 7, 2019

Behaviourist Theory for Atypical Behaviour

Behaviourist Theory (10 marks) First of all, behaviourists atomic number 18 psychologists that believe that behaviours atomic number 18 learnt or else of them being natural. Behaviourist theory believes that people learn to be neurotic rather than argon born phobic. Reason being, galore(postnominal) people consort their fear of an object or situation to something bad they have experienced. For instance, if person is scared of needles, it may have been be convey they had a bad experience with it as a child, thus causing a phobia. This I known as immaculate instruct education by association learn to unite a certain response with a certain stimulus.However, even behaviourists do take into account that some behaviour are not learnt, still are instinctive instead. This is called unconditi unrivaledd response. This contains of instinctive responses such as internal arousal and anxiety. Unconditioned responses are triggered by unconditioned stimulus. They can be objects or eve nts that naturally cause the reaction such as bear upon genitals might cause arousal or a little terror may cause us to be anxious. Yet, sometimes these responses happen in the presence of a neutral stimulus. Neutral stimuli dont cause a reaction.However we assume it does when we experience something good or bad. For example if a person ate chips and got sick -vomited, they may assume chips cause a bad reaction every single time. This is known as classical conditioning. Therefore each of the neutral stimuli is then described as a conditioned stimulus because they trigger a learnt response. A reaction to a conditioned stimulus is called a conditioned response. Also operant conditioning is a term used by the behaviourist to describe learning by consequences. If the consequences of an action are worthwhile we learn to do them again.Yet if the consequences are not good, we are likely not to do it again. Atypical behaviours are learnt in the same manner as typical behaviours. Atypical behaviours are just more uncommon cases of classical conditioning. One of the criticisms of this theory is that it ignores the approximation and the thinking behind it. For example if we two people got robbed at night, one is likely to think of it as one time incident and immobilize about it- rational. Whereas the other will think it will happen many times again irrational. Thus causes to develop a phobia of dark. assorted people have different outlook to the event.

No comments:

Post a Comment