Analysis of Medical Malpractice Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words

Analysis of Medical Malpractice - gaucherie Study ExampleMr. metalworker signed a consent form but only agree to the operating theatre because Mrs. metalworker had privately threatened to divorce him if he did not. ?As a result of the operation (which was competently performed), Mr. metalworkers tear drain improved, but he suffered a side rear of poor night vision. The risk of night vision problems was 2 percent, but mevery doctors consider it a minor problem as it has a limited adverse effect (due to the fact that people ar usu wholey asleep at ? night) and the operation is highly effective at improving tear drainage. Mr. Smith is a taxi driver and insists that he would not ease up had the operation had he known the risk. He is no longer able to work at night and has suffered a loss of income. ?In July, Mr. Smith visited Dr. genus Zeus, his GP, complaining that his left eye was still sore. Dr. Zeus suspected cancer of the eyelid. The computers were down so Dr. Zeus wrote a not e to his receptionist asking him to request a referral to a specialist for Mr. Smith, but the note got lost. As a result, the referral was delayed by 4 weeks. ?In August, Mr. Smith was seen by Dr. Foster who diagnosed an aggressive malignant eyelid cancer (which was unrelated to Mr. Smiths previous tear drainage problem). Expert designate is that symptoms of the eyelid cancer would have been visible to a reasonably competent ophthalmologist when the tear drainage surgery was performed. ...Here, within different realms of medical malpractice, each aspect of the case will be discussed. Mr. Smithwho seeks financial compensation and complains about his treatmentwill be advised to point out all of the following elements to the General Medical Council. II. Negligence Basically, there are four components or criteria of negligence which mustiness be met in order to establish that a patient has a case for medical malpractice (or any kind of tort) (Donoghue v. Stevenson, 2011, pp. 1). Donog hue v. Stevenson was a classic case in the sense that the plaintiff had found snails in her bottled beverage, and claimed that the come with owed her damages due to negligence. In a similar manner, Mr. Smith has every right to be hard put with not only Dr. Foster, but Mrs. Smith, Dr. Zeus, and Dr. Zeuss obviously incompetent staff. First of all, Dr. Foster should have mentioned that there was a 2 percent chance that his night vision might be affected. disappointment to alert him to this fact is definitely negligent on his part. In addition, Mrs. Smith, his wife, is not only involving herself in the miserable behavior of blackmailing her husband to have the surgery or else divorce himbut she is also criminally apt as a tortfeasor (a person who commits a tort) because she was a consultant ophthalmologist overseeing the surgery prime(prenominal) to Dr. Foster, and she did not report the fact that she saw cancer on her husbands eyelid.